Re: [ihc] Bigger is Better

To: "Tom Harais" <THarais@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Tom Mandera'" <tsm1@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ihc] Bigger is Better
From: "Ryan Moore" <baradium@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:09:24 -0600
Cc: <ihc-digest@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: "Ryan Moore" <baradium@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Harais" <[email protected]>
To: "'Tom Mandera'" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 17:50
Subject: RE: [ihc] Bigger is Better


>  There are
> much better tow vehicles available than the Scout, starting with
Travelalls.
> And, I believe that misters Thebert and Landry will concur based on their
> own experiences.
>
> Like I said, "it depends on how you are planning to use it".
>
> Tom H., '76 Traveler
>

And I've seen the results of what can happen even with a 3/4 ton (4x4 in
this case) travelall when something goes wrong...

-Ryan


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.805 / Virus Database: 547 - Release Date: 12/3/04

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ihc] Bigger is Better
  - From: Allan Ericson

References:
- RE: [ihc] Bigger is Better
  - From: Tom Harais

Prev by Date: RE: Reply: [ihc] Ebay Warning
Next by Date: RE: [ihc] COE 4x4 Loadstars
Previous by thread: RE: [ihc] Bigger is Better
Next by thread: Re: [ihc] Bigger is Better
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index