RE: Paragon video

To: "Daniel Nees" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Paragon video
From: "Costanzo" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 19:13:25 -0500
Cc: "Rob C" <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Costanzo" <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

My opinion:  a Scout II with 4" suspension & 3" body lift, 33's, is about
the "perfect" size.  It's not ridiculously monster-ized, yet for a "smaller"
truck, it still gives off quite a presence.  Thanks, Rob, for the
opportunity to see such beauty first hand.  I'll send my IHC-Anonymous
donation requests to your address. <g>

Joe Costanzo
'79 Scout II


-----Original Message-----


Joe,
   It's funny that you should be talking about 33's. I've told Chuck for
years that 31's is as big as I would ever go, but; saturday I was just
telling him I may go to 33's! This stuff is really addictive!

_____Dan Nees_____
[email protected]

References:
- RE: Paragon video
  - From: [email protected] (Daniel Nees)

Prev by Date: RE: IHers suspiciously quiet on Valantine's Day
Next by Date: RE: IHers suspiciously quiet on Valantine's Day
Prev by thread: RE: Paragon video
Next by thread: RE: IHers suspiciously quiet on Valantine's Day
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index