[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Thermo's third law
- Subject: RE: Thermo's third law
- From: "Gilbert, Clark" <Clark_Gilbert@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:10:24 -0600
Nope, I think you both have it wrong. The closest thing we got to a
perpetual motion machine is Kliborti's posts. I keep waitin' for the
good 'ol 3rd law to kick in, and reduce the posts on friction of his
keyboard alone. But I think that the impetus from JimC and the
collective Bubba's keep kicking the flywheel over. At least he procured
a spell checker, now all=
he nee=
ds
is to ge=
t rid of t=
he damn =
= signs.
See how irritating it is Mark? Try ANY other send settings to see the
effect.
Clark
> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 11:17:24 -0800
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Third Law
>
> Bill,
>
> Not even close.The net energy into the system is quite high with the
> amount
> of energy needed to create and supply the cyro fluids. At best it's an
> interesting low resistance (negative resistance?) path.
>
> - -Kevin
> BMWCCA (CryoGenic Car Club of America)
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
------------------------------