[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Efficient Engines
- Subject: Re: Efficient Engines
- From: Luis Marques <marques@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 17:21:17 -0500
> From: Neil Deshpande <[email protected]>
>
> Instead of having the throttle butterfly valve control air flow, the
> engine uses variable valve opening.....
>
> Efficiency is increased by eliminating the butterfly valve's
> restricting presence.
I read something about this somewhere not too long ago. Although the
design could potentially be more efficient, the absence of a throttle
butterfly will only give a tiny bit more power at WOT (and then only
maybe 0.5%). At any other time you are simply moving the restriction
from the throttle to the valves - you still have the pressure drop.
Where there could be a small increase in efficiency is at part throttle,
due to the lower effective reciprocating mass since the valves only have
to move back and fourth a minute amount. Reciprocating mass losses go
up with the square of the velocity, which is propotional to the
displacement at any given RPM. Put another way, a higher lift camshaft
zaps more power out of the engine than a smaller one because the valves
have to move further while opening and closing.
Luis Marques
'97 328i
------------------------------