[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bmw] pictures of bmw crash



As a heavy Photoshop user, my impression is that it has been "shopped."  And
I agree with the commentary about forces being strong enough to fold a
unibody car, but somehow leaving the tree just as firmly rooted as
pre-impact.

But, I can say with certainty that Jason of Zionsville is correct: that's
not a BMW.  No modern BMW were shipped with 4-lug wheels, and this car is a
front-drive model, to boot.

mjc

    -= Mark Justin Cecil == New Orleans, LA == [email protected] =-
                    -= http://noml.dyndns.org/mark.html =-
    -= UNIX/Storage Architecture, Implementation, and Administration =-

           "The truth is the truth, no matter what you *believe*"


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Doug Dykaar" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 7:31 AM
Subject: RE: [bmw] pictures of bmw crash


> Tom,
>
> I think the pictures are fake. No debris. The ground would be covered with
> the missing bits that weren't on (in) the tree. Looks like an art project
> (e.g. Carhenge).
>
> I fixed the first link (below).
>
> -doug
> 85 535
> 86 951
> 94 855
>
> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:10:13 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
> From: Tom Mathews <[email protected]>
> Subject: [bmw] pictures of bmw crash
>
> Does anyone the story behind these pictures that are circulating on the
web?
>
>
http://home.earthlink.net/~bimrone/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/01
> k.jpg
>
>
http://home.earthlink.net/~bimrone/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/02
> k.jpg
>
>
http://home.earthlink.net/~bimrone/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/06
> k.jpg
> --
> to be removed from bmw, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
> or email "unsubscribe bmw" to [email protected]
--
to be removed from bmw, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe bmw" to [email protected]